“Interpreting The Day the Earth Stood Still for Contemporary Film Audiences” Review Essay

In the article â€Å"Interpreting The Day the Earth Stood Still for Contemporary Film Audiences† written in 2008, the Author, Joshua Pardon, expounds on the messages that were sent to the American film crowd of 1951 through the film The Day the Earth Stood Still, in light of a short story by Harry Bates written in 1940. These messages extended from points like the cultural expenses of nuclear innovation and both a negative and positive perspective on militarism, to analysis of the broad communications. He additionally expounds on how, not at all like TV shows, and stories by the time of increased birth rates age depicted the 1950’s as when everything was awesome for each resident constantly, the contention can be made that it was a â€Å"strange and weird† time loaded with vulnerability, dread, and distrustfulness; and this film depicts these sentiments, with solid messages that Pardon recommend could be applied to current world occasions. To improve you comprehe nd his article, he included a very elegantly composed summery of the film followed by translations of the film’s scenes that could be applied to what was going on in America in 1951 and occasions occurring in 2008. He looks at the Cold War’s potential to prompt nuclear disaster to the ebb and flow war on fear mongering; the public’s disarray on whether to believe researcher to the momentum discussion of undeveloped cell inquire about, environmental change and the logical premise of development; and the media’s need to sensationalize recent developments detract from the main problems both in 1951 and today. I would need to state that Pardon’s article is extremely persuading and elegantly composed; the measure of data given by the writer is palatable. There is a lot of foundation data on what were the recent developments during the 1950s on each translation on the not all that concealed messages of the film that permit you to see the comparability of today’s issues and obviously perceive how the film can be relatable today. Additionally, it goes into subtleties of each significant character, and even thinks about characters to explicit famous individuals from th at period, for example, Albert Einstein; and even the character Tom Stevens, an organization man with narrow minded goals as a negative depiction of an eager American business culture. Such incredible subtleties of understanding make this article a generally excellent and satisfying read. As I would see it, the most fragile piece of this article is that, in spite of the fact that the data given permits you to portray what the writer is attempting to convey, it frequently included a lot of data of what nearly felt like unessential data. Also, I felt that the writer hopped from one subject to the next,â just to bring it back up later in the article, and despite the fact that it wasn’t confounding and the data was consistently unique, it caused the subject to feel repetitive. To summarize, Pardon’s article on the understanding of the film The Day the Earth Stood Still, was an enlightening and educational article that plainly shows all the political messages in the film. His words had the option to portray what was going on in 1951, when the film was made, with the goal that you can more readily comprehend the messages that were being sent by the film th at permitted us to more readily perceive how, despite the fact that it had been more than 60 decades since this article was composed, the film is as yet important today.